Research

We evaluated 100 fintech signups. Here is what we found.

The Auxos Fintech Onboarding Friction Index, Q1 2026

Auxos··8 min read
Fintech Onboarding Friction Index — overall rankings
Fintech Onboarding Friction Index — overall rankings

Signing up for a financial app should be simple. Pick an app, hand over some basic information, and you are in. In reality, most people do not make it that far.

Drop-off during onboarding is one of the biggest and most invisible problems in fintech. Companies spend heavily to bring users to their signup page, only to lose them somewhere in the flow. Too many steps, confusing language, a trust moment that does not land, or a slow and frustrating process. The user gives up, and the company never finds out exactly why.

At Auxos, we built a way to measure this before it becomes a problem. We run swarms of AI personas through digital products the same way real users would, and we capture everything. How long it takes. Where they hesitate. When they fail. What they feel. The result is a detailed behavioral picture of what your onboarding flow is actually like for the person going through it.

This report is our first public look at what that data shows across the fintech industry.

What We Did

We selected 10 consumer fintech apps across categories including investing, banking, trading, payments, and wealth management. For each app, we ran AI personas through the full signup flow. Each persona has distinct behavioral traits, from risk tolerance and tech comfort to communication style and hesitation patterns.

We then scored each company across four dimensions: how complex the flow is structurally, how much cognitive effort it demands, how much trust it builds or erodes, and how well it handles friction and errors. Those four scores add up to a total Onboarding Index out of 100.

The Overall Rankings

Fintech Onboarding Friction Index — overall rankings

The results span a meaningful range. Webull, Current, Robinhood, and Ally all scored 98 or above, meaning their onboarding flows are clean, fast, and trust-building across nearly every dimension. Wealthfront and Wise came in at 88, leaving real room for improvement.

A few points might not sound like a big difference, but in practice each point represents a specific friction source that a real user is hitting. At scale, that translates directly into lost signups.

Breaking Down the Score

Score category breakdown — Structural, Cognitive, Trust, Recovery

The overall score is built from four sub-scores, each worth 25 points.

Structural measures the raw complexity of the flow: how many screens, how many required fields, how many redirects or authentication steps. A high Structural score means the path to completion is clean and short. A low score means the flow is asking too much before the user is even committed.

Cognitive measures how hard the flow is to think through. Even a technically short flow can be exhausting if decisions stack up quickly. This score captures the mental effort the signup demands.

Trust measures whether the flow makes the user feel confident or cautious. Financial apps ask for sensitive information, and that requires the right tone and timing. Our AI personas flag moments where they hesitate or express negative sentiment, and this score reflects how many of those moments appear.

Recovery measures what happens when something goes wrong. A step fails, an input is rejected, or a session stalls. Apps that handle those moments well keep users moving forward. Apps that do not lose them.

The breakdown is where the most useful signal lives. Two companies with the same total score can have very different profiles. One might fly through the Structural and Cognitive dimensions but stumble on Trust. Knowing the dimension breakdown tells you exactly where to focus.

Time on Task and Drop-Off Risk

Time friction and drop-off risk by company

Speed matters. Our data shows completion times ranging from 28 seconds for Webull to over 100 seconds for eToro. That gap is significant. Every extra second in a signup flow is another moment where a user can reconsider.

Alongside completion time, we estimate a drop-off probability for each app. This is not just about time. It factors in the overall friction score and the conversion rate observed across our simulations. Wise came in highest at 51%, meaning roughly half of users who start that flow may not finish it. Robinhood sat at the bottom of the risk range at 31%.

These numbers are not hypothetical. They reflect the behavioral patterns of 100 simulated users making the same choices a real person would.

How We Score It

Methodology — how the Friction Index is scored

Our scoring model is built around four independently measured dimensions, each grounded in specific behavioral signals our AI personas generate during the simulation. Structural and Cognitive scores reflect the observed complexity of the flow. Trust and Recovery scores come directly from persona behavior: hesitations, sentiment shifts, failed steps, and early exits.

The drop-off estimate combines time, score, and conversion into a single probability. Time to sign up is the average session duration across all personas, whether they completed the flow or not.

The goal is not to produce a league table. It is to give product teams a clear, measurable picture of where their onboarding is working and where it is not.

The Friction Index Is Just the Start

The scores and rankings in this report are a summary. Under the surface, there is a lot more.

For every company we test, we can show you what each individual persona experienced at each step. Where they slowed down. What they were thinking. Which moment caused a drop in sentiment. Why one user type completed the flow when another type with slightly different characteristics did not.

That level of detail is what turns a score into a roadmap. It is the difference between knowing your Trust score is 21 out of 25 and knowing that users are hesitating at the identity verification screen because the copy does not explain what the information is used for.

We also generate analysis on what changes would move the needle most, so product teams can prioritize improvements with confidence before any real user sees them.

A Note on This Report

The simulations in this report used off-the-shelf AI personas. This gives a consistent baseline across all 10 companies and is useful for industry-level comparison.

For companies that want to go deeper, we can build and run personas calibrated to their specific user base: demographic profiles, behavioral tendencies, and use cases that match the customers they are actually trying to convert. That kind of tailored simulation is where the signal gets significantly sharper.

Run Auxos on your product

Want to see your own onboarding flow through this lens? Reach out and we will set up a custom simulation scoped to your users and your flow.

contact@auxos.dev

AI Behavioral Benchmarking · 10 Companies · Q1 2026